Rabid Google leftists block paranoid wingnut websites!

HAHAHAHAHA! You wingnuts3may have heard about the renegade warning message from Google that was appearing on a lot of websites earlier today. I first read about it on a couple of progressive blogs, where there was some mild curiousity about what might be up, but no panic.  What for?

In Wingnut World, it was a different story. When the warning messages started appearing, the spittle flecked and the cheetos flew as paranoid conservatives spun their bearings and panic buttons were pushed all around:  the Obama-controlled Google (Goobama) was blocking conservative websites for their own nefarious purposes, and…

OHMYGODWHATTHEFUCK!!! Free speech lockdown in Obamerica!!!

From American Stinker:

american_stinkerThese incidents come on the heels of the news that Google moved quickly to spike a “Google Bomb” aimed at Obama while taking 3 years to stop similar bombs against Bush

Ahhh.  The wingnutters were pissed that Google intercepted and destroyed their Google bomb in record time, compared to the 3 years that “miserable failure” was directed to Bush’s bio.  So when they started seeing all the warning messages, they just assumed that they were being summarily censored as punishment by the hateful marxists at Google.  It all makes sense now.

Back on the Planet Earth, what really happened:

Computer users doing Google searches during a nearly one-hour period Saturday morning were greeted with disturbing but erroneous messages that every site turned up in the results might be harmful.

The company blamed the mistake on human error and apologized for any inconvenience caused to users and site owners whose pages were incorrectly labeled.

Nothing to see here, of course.  The only weirdness about this little routine is that the wingnuts apparently only googled their own wingnut sites and didn’t try googling some lefty sites as well,  just to, you know, see?  And make sure they weren’t jumping to conclusions and looking, oh, I don’t know… stupid??   But what’s the fun in that, when their way they get to indulge in self-righteousness, indignance and persecution all rolled up in one paranoid package?  If only for a moment!

34 Responses to “Rabid Google leftists block paranoid wingnut websites!”


  1. 1 Chimera Sunday, February 1, 2009 at 1:24 am

    It might have been a rogue Google worker, whatever they’re called.

    A few years ago, if you searched “weapons of mass destruction” and clicked on the “I’m feeling lucky” button, you got a page of a totally hilarious send-up of Dubya and his war on terror — a freaky and very funny satire.

    It lasted about a week. I didn’t bother to copy it because I didn’t realize that it was a rogue employee ( who apparently got fired right after they found out who he was), and I thought I’d be able to access it whenever I wanted.

  2. 2 Torontonian Sunday, February 1, 2009 at 2:15 am

    . . . The only weirdness about this little routine is that the wingnuts apparently only googled their own wingnut sites and didn’t try googling some lefty sites as well, just to, you know, see? And make sure they weren’t jumping to conclusions and looking, oh, I don’t know… stupid??

    —————–

    The obviously didn’t want anything to taint their thinking.
    All they know is their little world because the rest of the
    world is out to get them–or so they think. Exposure to
    other views might hurt their collective brain and it’s quite
    enough considering their TV sets are spying on them!

  3. 3 ProudNOTtobeprogressive Sunday, February 1, 2009 at 3:37 am

    Just thought I would drop by and see if this moonbat community has figured out which of the 23 clauses of the Authorization to Use Force Against Iraq are “lies”–since the last time I brought it up, feminazi JJ banned me.

    I bet you all are furious that Iraq had elections yesterday–since your ilk took to the streets protesting to keep the massmurdering Saddam Hussein in power.

    And how nice of the Retard-in-Chief – The Fresh Prez of Bill Ayers – to give money to other countries to promote killing the most innocent members of society–babies.

    Ta ta since I know JJ will ban me again for not marching in lockstep with the Marxist community. Oh wait! JJ claims she is a libertarian. Thus all the far left websites in her blogroll. Must be some of that Kerryesque nuance.

  4. 4 Scott Tribe Sunday, February 1, 2009 at 6:12 am

    Oh I don’t know.. I’d almost campaign to JJ to keep you on as comedy relief.

  5. 5 hemmingforddogblog Sunday, February 1, 2009 at 6:44 am

    PNTBP: JJ has banned you because you are a moran. 8)

  6. 6 Dr. Prole Sunday, February 1, 2009 at 8:51 am

    Oh Ptoob. Why the fuck aren’t YOU over in Iraq fightin’ for our freedums?

  7. 7 Aunty Em Ericann Sunday, February 1, 2009 at 2:02 pm

    That’s all they have left is fear. It’s a damn shame when it recoils back on themselves. Goobers!

    With all my love,
    Aunty Em

  8. 8 notveryhow Sunday, February 1, 2009 at 2:34 pm

    Concerning NOTprogressing. Wow, do they mass produce these people somewhere. I’ve been on a dozen blogs and these “Cantservatives” all sound alike. The smug sarcasm and the cadenced rant, and the unthinking repetition of discredited ideas.

    Is it talk radio that produces this mindnumbing doublethink?

    Anyway. Unrepentant hippie. Thanx for existing. Maybe we’ll see each other on the Funway.

  9. 9 JJ Sunday, February 1, 2009 at 4:31 pm

    Chimera – Nah, I don’t think it was a rogue worker, it was a glitch — the human error kind — and every other site got the warning message. Nothing to see here! Nobody’s being persecuted… awwww…

  10. 10 JJ Sunday, February 1, 2009 at 4:38 pm

    Torontonian –

    The obviously didn’t want anything to taint their thinking.

    Yeah, I can see how it might be a little scary for them to have to take a sip on anything other than the Rush-Approved Formula. But geez, they didn’t have to actually read the sites, just check to see if they’re also getting the google warning, rather than getting all in a TIZZY over nothing. What a bunch of brain-damaged, paranoid creeps.

  11. 12 JJ Sunday, February 1, 2009 at 4:40 pm

    Scott – Ptoob was amusing for awhile, but wore out her/his/it’s welcome. Even my patience has limits.

  12. 13 JJ Sunday, February 1, 2009 at 4:42 pm

    SQ – Calling Ptoob a moran is an insult to all the morans of the world. Morans I can handle. Complete fucking imbeciles try my patience.

  13. 14 JJ Sunday, February 1, 2009 at 4:47 pm

    Dr.Prole – We all know why. Let’s not humiliate Ptoob any more than he/she/it humiliates itself.

  14. 15 JJ Sunday, February 1, 2009 at 4:51 pm

    Auntie Em – Long-term fearmongering seldom ends well. Like advanced syphillis, it eventually starts gnawing away at the brain.

  15. 16 JJ Sunday, February 1, 2009 at 5:02 pm

    notveryhow

    I’ve been on a dozen blogs and these “Cantservatives” all sound alike. The smug sarcasm and the cadenced rant, and the unthinking repetition of discredited ideas.

    There are some pretty bright conservatives out there. Unfortunately their intelligence tends to fluctuate in inverse proportion to how much they mouth off.

  16. 17 Chet Scoville Sunday, February 1, 2009 at 6:47 pm

    and didn’t try googling some lefty sites as well, just to, you know, see?

    Or even any neutral sites like, I don’t know, Boing Boing or YouTube?

  17. 18 JJ Sunday, February 1, 2009 at 8:52 pm

    Chet – You’d think so, wouldn’t you? Can they really be that stupid, or is it just that they so enjoy the persecution high? Maybe both.

  18. 19 Phatbiker Sunday, February 1, 2009 at 10:44 pm

    I checked out that American Thinker websight. HOLY CRAP! what a bunch of foaming at the mouth right-wing crack-pots. Make the wing-nuts over at FD look tame.

  19. 20 RealityBites Monday, February 2, 2009 at 4:59 am

    Chet there are no neutral sites to them.

  20. 21 Chet Scoville Monday, February 2, 2009 at 7:05 am

    Ah, true. Funny pictures of cats have a well-known liberal bias.

  21. 22 JJ Monday, February 2, 2009 at 8:11 am

    Phatbiker :lol: AT is one of the wingnuttiest sites around. I only read it when it’s linked to by some Canadian wingnut — it’s too much Crazy for me.

  22. 23 JJ Monday, February 2, 2009 at 8:13 am

    RB – That’s true — anything that doesn’t foam with ultraconservative wingnuttery is considered “far left”.

  23. 24 JJ Monday, February 2, 2009 at 8:18 am

    chet

    Funny pictures of cats have a well-known liberal bias.

    Of course they do — the giveaway is Humour. The evidence is in that this is a difficult concept for conservatives.

  24. 25 Reality Bites Monday, February 2, 2009 at 8:22 am

    Certainly yahoo would have done many things to offend them over the years. Certainly this is more than enough to quality:

    Yahoo! Inc. Endorses the Proposed Employment Non-Discrimination Act (ENDA) found on Yahoo! Celebrates Pride 2008

  25. 26 JJ Monday, February 2, 2009 at 8:49 am

    RB – Oh, Yahoo, those Marxists.

    Didn’t Google change the logo on their homepage to rainbow during pride week? I seem to remember them doing something like that to recognize Pride.

  26. 27 Frank Frink Monday, February 2, 2009 at 9:53 am

    Don’t mean to offend. I love dogs, really I do, and they love me. But, in response to Chet, no point or purpose in them using Teh Google to search for funny cat pictures. Everybody knows cats are liberal. Dogs are conservative. ;-)

  27. 28 JJ Monday, February 2, 2009 at 10:10 am

    FF

    Dogs are conservative.

    Not my dog! She’s a social animal who gets along with everyone. Human, Dog, Cat, Bird, Snake — she doesn’t judge, she’s very live-and-let-live.

  28. 29 Mike Monday, February 2, 2009 at 10:52 am

    Uhm, there was a mistake on Saturday where EVERY SEARCH RESULT displayed by Google for any search displayed that warning. Every single one.

    These idiots have a crazed persecution complex. No a persecution fetish, since they seem to enjoy it and lust after it at a near sexual level.

    And is it me, or does Uncle Sam look like he’s taking a bug dump in that American Thinker logo?

    Could explain the quality of the site.

  29. 30 mouthyorange Monday, February 2, 2009 at 11:53 am

    Frank, you’ve got it wrong about dogs. How dare you suggest such a thing! Wait — I’ve got it! You’re just here to push buttons and bait righteous, dog-loving people. ;}

    Mike – “they seem to enjoy it and lust after it at a near sexual level.” Yep, more evidence of sexual repression in action. All kinds of people in 20th century documented the ways it can distort the human personality. It goes subliminal into all kinds of things.

  30. 31 Frank Frink Monday, February 2, 2009 at 2:00 pm

    mouthyorange, you’re on to me. Damn! ;-)

  31. 32 JJ Tuesday, February 3, 2009 at 2:24 am

    Mike

    And is it me, or does Uncle Sam look like he’s taking a bug dump in that American Thinker logo?

    :lol: No, it’s not just you. It’s at least you and me.

  32. 33 Dr. Prole Tuesday, February 3, 2009 at 7:56 am

    Make that three of us. I thought at first glance it was a joke, like, “American Thinker, yah most of us macho REAL Merkins do our best thinking on the toilet…”

  33. 34 mouthyorange Tuesday, February 3, 2009 at 8:01 am

    Me, too. Big shit.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s




Mac Security Portal
Rose's Place
Blogging Change

Incoming!

  • 548,712
[Most Recent Quotes from www.kitco.com]

Archives

twitter