Pope Ratzi sticks to his archaic, obsolete guns

And sticks it to little 9-year-old girls who get raped by their stepfathers.   But so what?  There’s primitive, barbaric 1200-year-old Doctrine to uphold!:

In a tucked away “clarification” published on page 7 of a recent edition of L’Osservatore Romano, the Vatican produced a document that unequivocally confirmed automatic excommunication for anyone involved in an abortion – even in such a situation as dire as the Brazilian case. It settles any questions about the absolute nature of Church doctrine on the matter of abortion – but could potentially reignite the PR firestorm.  [...]

…”We have laws, we have a discipline, we have a doctrine of the faith,” the official says. “This is not just theory. And you can’t start backpedaling just because the real-life situation carries a certain human weight.” Benedict makes it ever more clear that his strict approach to doctrine will remain a central pillar to his papacy, bad publicity be damned.

No, for the sake of whatever hateful god these heartless, mindless,  shit-eating monsters offer their spittle-flecked prayers to, no backpedaling on the cruel and obsolete doctrine that’s allowed them to hold sway over the lives of so many for so long.  Not even when “the real-life situation carries a certain human weight” — like about 80 lbs, the size of the 9-year-old girl who the church in all its wisdom deems far less important than the 5 ounces of non-sentient tissue that was growing inside her, without her consent, planted there by the most heinous means imaginable.

Even more nauseatingly, there will be no shortage of vicious scum who defend this odious pronouncement and the perverse and wretched “doctrine” it upholds.

(h/t A Creative Revolution)

12 Responses to “Pope Ratzi sticks to his archaic, obsolete guns”


  1. 1 J. A. Baker Sunday, July 19, 2009 at 12:14 pm

    Gee, I wonder what Suzie-All-Caps’ response will be to this…

    On second thought, never mind. I think I already know what it will be…

  2. 2 hemmingforddogblog Sunday, July 19, 2009 at 1:15 pm

    Shorter Ratzi: Hey, we looked at ourselves and we don’t have a problem with our holier than thou attitude!

  3. 3 JJ Sunday, July 19, 2009 at 1:29 pm

    JAB – Oh, the ALLCAPSed one already defended the excommunication, with the suggestion that the girl could have had a hysterectomy(!) to save the feti. No doubt where she stands.

  4. 4 JJ Sunday, July 19, 2009 at 1:31 pm

    Even shorter Ratzi: A fetus must be saved by any means necessary. A little girl — meh.

  5. 5 mouthyorange Sunday, July 19, 2009 at 2:09 pm

    I think that everyone should be a fetus. I mean, the world — the human world — should be populated by feti and nothing else. Let them run everything! Down with all post-born people! Then there will be no one left who could do a fetus any harm.

    Maybe then the Almighty Fetus will appear and take all the little feti to heaven. And there will never be problems anymore.

  6. 6 JJ Sunday, July 19, 2009 at 2:17 pm

    :lol: “Our Fetus, who art in utero
    Cletus be thy name…”

  7. 7 mouthyorange Sunday, July 19, 2009 at 3:46 pm

    “Our Fetus, who art in utero,
    Cletus be thy name.
    Thy Kingdom come, as your parents did, or at least your father did, for which we are eternally grateful.
    Thy will be done on earth as it is in heaven, since only thy will, as it has been projected upon you and interpreted by us, be done anymore.
    Give us this day our placental nourishment,
    And be assured that none shall ever again trespass into your space,
    For thine is the kingdom,
    The father’s orgasm the power and the glory,
    May he keep coming forever,
    Almond.”

  8. 8 Michelle Sunday, July 19, 2009 at 4:43 pm

    JJ writes: Oh, the ALLCAPSed one already defended the excommunication, with the suggestion that the girl could have had a hysterectomy(!) to save the feti. No doubt where she stands.

    You have got to be kidding – she hasn’t figured out the part about a hysterectomy involving removal of the uterus, which would no doubt be terminal for the gestating fetuses?

  9. 9 J. A. Baker Sunday, July 19, 2009 at 5:11 pm

    Oh, the ALLCAPSed one already defended the excommunication, with the suggestion that the girl could have had a hysterectomy(!) to save the feti. No doubt where she stands.

    Oh, I know all that. I watched it live. I was just wondering what her reaction to Papa Nazi’s latest missive on the case would be. Rhetorically speaking, of course.

  10. 10 JJ Monday, July 20, 2009 at 5:41 pm

    orange – :lol: Excellent!

  11. 11 JJ Monday, July 20, 2009 at 5:44 pm

    Michelle – Well, I think she sort of figured it out, but according to her this would be better than terminating them in utero for some reason. Something to do with dignity of the body, or desecrating a body or something like that. Not that I agree with it, it’s insane to render this girl sterile rather than let her have an abortion, just for the sake of keeping the dead fetuses’ bodies more or less intact.

  12. 12 JJ Monday, July 20, 2009 at 5:44 pm

    JAB – She hasn’t published a response yet. She hasn’t been blogging much lately, her computer is hooped.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s




Mac Security Portal
Rose's Place
Blogging Change

Incoming!

  • 617,741
[Most Recent Quotes from www.kitco.com]

Archives


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 55 other followers

%d bloggers like this: