… re-writing an article without explaining why such major edits were made. Oh sure, it says “updated” at the top: since when does “updated” mean “practically re-written as dictated by fetus fetishists”??:
Ottawa Sun May 11 (top of article)
Ottawa Sun May 11 (bottom of article)
And those aren’t the only changes, the whole thing is riddled with them. Good thing that for the entertainment and edification of my readers, I have…
SCREENSHOTS AT 11!!!
Ottawa Sun, Thursday May 10
Ottawa Sun, May 10 (Part DUH!)
I guess I’d be a little embarrassed too if I’d CAVED under the unrelenting, spittle-flecked pressure of a few crazed fetus fetishists. But letting them practically dictate a re-write to you? Wow. And you guys wonder why you have no credibility.
The truth is out there, and it shall be screenshat!
(h/t – fern hill)
![[Most Recent Quotes from www.kitco.com]](http://www.kitconet.com/charts/metals/silver/tny_ag_en_usoz_2.gif)
![[Most Recent Quotes from www.kitco.com]](http://www.kitconet.com/charts/metals/gold/t24_au_en_usoz_2.gif)
Sorry but i watched that piss-poor excuse for a march in the Tube last night..a few hundred, maybe…
But really, who cares? If this is another Harpo ‘set-up’ it was a dismal failure…
You saw it on TV? Fun.
In fairness to the Fetus Fetishists, their annual parade of pain usually does manage to garner a respectable turnout for a fringe issue. They usually get about 7-8000, which in my view is pretty good — so it’s always baffled me that they have to lie about it. What’s wrong with 8000? That’s a lot of fetus fetishists moaning and groaning in the throes of an indignance high.