Lifesite = Lie Site

I’m surprised every pair of padlocked pants at Lifesite doesn’t spontaneously burst into a blazing inferno.

Today Lifesite’s jabbering gerbils report that James Pouillion, the abortion clinic protester who was  killed in September by a nutcase on a murderous rampage, will be getting an award from Operation Rescum.  But something isn’t quite right with the story, as Lifesite tells it:

Get that?  “A local man, Harlan Drake, has admitted to targeting Mr. Pouillon for death because he did not agree with his views on abortion.”

Except that’s not really what happened, at all, because Drake’s views on abortion are unknown.  What is known is that he had no connection with the prochoice movement, and that he confessed to police that he’d targeted Pouillon because he was offended by Pouillon’s gory signs being displayed near a school:

So far, it seems Drake was angry at Pouillon for holding graphic signs of aborted fetuses in front of the Owosso High School as children went by, something Pouillon had been doing for years.

But Drake apparently had no connection with the pro-choice movement, and it seems he had a grudge against a few people. He is also accused of gunning down Owosso gravel company owner Mike Fuoss last Friday morning because he was angry at him, though Fuoss has no connection to either side of the abortion movement.

…which is just a *little* different than the way Lifesite’s spinning the story.  I guess the story just doesn’t pack the same persecutional punch when it’s told, you know, the way it really happened.

Lifesite:  where the 9th commandment is always negotiable.

8 Responses to “Lifesite = Lie Site”

  1. 1 hemmingforddogblog Thursday, December 17, 2009 at 1:58 am

    A little bit off topic, or maybe not…

    The delightful Patrick Ross (who is trying to stay relevant) left the below quote over at Hunter’s (I’m a dim bulb in the chandelier of life) site. Of course, you can’t reply because comment moderation is on — free speech doncha know!

    “There are, of course, militant lunatics as well (JJ, Fern Hill, Antonia Zerbisias — we’re looking in your general direction).”

  2. 2 JJ Thursday, December 17, 2009 at 5:46 am

    😆 “Militant lunatic”: Well I should certainly hope so.

  3. 3 fern hill Thursday, December 17, 2009 at 6:09 am

    Zow. That’s some company I’m in. 😀

  4. 4 deBeauxOs Thursday, December 17, 2009 at 6:41 am

    Yeah, he likes y’all.

    Me, not so much.


  5. 5 deBeauxOs Thursday, December 17, 2009 at 6:45 am

    That was supposed to be a pouting smily.

  6. 6 dehka Thursday, December 17, 2009 at 8:19 am

    I think… the line about combustible padlocked pants just made my entire day. No joke.

  7. 7 JJ Thursday, December 17, 2009 at 3:32 pm

    deBeauxOs – Well, since you’re a co-blogger with the notorious fern hill, some of her militant lunacy will rub off after awhile, eh?

  8. 8 JJ Thursday, December 17, 2009 at 3:38 pm

    dehka – The modern day version of a chastity belt:

Wait. What?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

Mac Security Portal
Rose's Place
Blogging Change


  • 632,281
[Most Recent Quotes from]


%d bloggers like this: