Especially owners of the kind of dog whose tails curl upward, exposing their little bung-holes for all to admire. There’s a New Product that might be just the thing to give your pet a little privacy… “Rear Gear” Butt Covers!:
No, really:
They’re sold out right now, so this looks to be what the well-dressed pet will be wearing this spring.
(via the slog)
![[Most Recent Quotes from www.kitco.com]](https://i0.wp.com/www.kitconet.com/charts/metals/silver/tny_ag_en_usoz_2.gif)
![[Most Recent Quotes from www.kitco.com]](https://i0.wp.com/www.kitconet.com/charts/metals/gold/t24_au_en_usoz_2.gif)
unrepentant old hippie 
Do they make those in sizes MASSIVE enuff to hide ReformaTory MPs from public view?
do they have one with the smiling face of stockwell day on it?
I’m looking forward to removing these from plugged up intestines – just another foreign body ingestion waiting to happen. Is this fur reals?
I don’t think it’s fur reals. All three butt plugs are in perfect focus, despite the different distances from the lens. Whimsical photoshopping.
No Balb, it is unfortunately real. Creepy, butt real… 🙂
Probably more useful for plumbers than dogs.
Ugh. Ok you know I have to ask, how are they attached?
Yes, they are fur real.
They are attached by little strings that go around the base of the tail.
My dog would never put up with such a thing, but maybe she’s just picky.
I can’t imagine any pet putting up with this. Having a trap door banging on that furless region would make any pet stop, drop and lick. Your dog sounds pretty reasonable, to me.
My dog is fairly dumb, but she’s not dumb enough to put up with something tied to her tail and swatting her butt. She would have that thing off and torn to shreds in about 2 seconds.
Dumb maybe, but not dumb enough to put up with a pooper patter.
Might Brian be Jasper under a new Rear Gear Butt Cover?
deBeauxOs – No, Brian is not Jasper. He’s okay, for a wingnut 😉 😆
Cue Brian’s outraged response in 3…2…1…
ROTFLMAO… I guess the lack of response means you can’t “count” on me…
Howard the Duck lives. (yes, I’m geeking)
This product coming to you from the mindset of the people who have been brainbleached into finding animals ‘nekked’ and shameful in their nekkedity. Next up, animal burkas.
Not just gnawing, but butt scooting will be involved in many tormented animals’ lives. not to mention…when said animal has defecated or whatever, doesn’t that pile of rejects from car-airfreshener oversupply automatically become a dangly waste catcher?
The fact they appear to *be* cheap car air fresheners makes me also question the reality of this as a product, but I am reminded constantly of the attributed PT Barnum factor (known well to all advertising agencies) “no one ever went broke underestimating the intelligence of the American public”. I wouldn’t doubt they *are* repurposed airfresheners, carrying the helpful hazard of impregnated artificial aromatics to irritate fido’s butthole.
And you know that with such certainty how, again?
Just a minor personal pedantic irritant… but, although popularly (mis)attributed to him, Barnum never said, “no one ever went broke underestimating the intelligence of the American public”.
The actual quote is: “No one in this world has ever lost money by underestimating the intelligence of the great masses of the plain people. Nor has anyone ever lost public office thereby.”
And the source is H.L. Mencken.
And you know that with such certainty how, again?
Ummm…because they went through the trouble of designing, developing, producing and peddling a product whose only purpose is to hide the buttholes of animals? Just a guess.
A guess I have no problem with; guesses are necessary, since we can’t always get all the details. But this incessant, authoritative assignation of people’s motives with nothing to go on but a “snapshot” of how things are; not so much. That’s why I asked.
Brian is coming here to scold people like a ninny your new hobby?
Dr. Prole,
That’s not it at all. Rather, it’s this: I have confidence that improved reasoning skills of the population at large — recognizing straw men, recognizing begging the question, recognizing false dilemmas, recognizing when someone is poisoning the wells — will be nothing but beneficial — very few people will be willing to be knowingly mislead.
As things stand, people are routinely pushed around like snow by a snow plow by trickery by politicians, advocacy groups, crafty but slanted blogs, astro-turf and mainstream media (news and other) using just those sorts of false argument methods.
Unfortunately, schools generally don’t teach how to think in any subject but math. They teach what answers to give to questions through memorization, but they are thin on teaching how to derive answers. Consequently, all around us are people who lack the skills to think. Everywhere I go, at all times, I try to do my part to improve society, and society’s chances.
I mean, look at how many people don’t know how to use punctuation (which is a form of thought organization, not a “quiz”), don’t know how to use capitalization or possessive apostrophes(evidences of organized thought), don’t know the difference between “their,” “there” & “they’re”, Between “then” & “than”, between compose v. comprise, don’t know how to spell, don’t understand the meaning of subjective and objective, don’t know when to use “him and me” v. “he and I,” don’t know when to use lay v. lie, and so on. And these are just the foundational components of organized thinking and recognizing the meaning of what you read or hear.
It appears that most people participating here are eager to make their world a better place. This is part of my way of doing just that, and I am passionate about it.
Good morrow, all!
Nature is nekkid.
Nekkid is bad.
Therefore, nature is bad.
No, Man is stupid. What’s next, doggie diapers? Poochie Pampers? Or did I miss the memo on that one? Might as well duct tape the collection bag in place.
On the other hand, it’s the Silly Season, and hey! it helps somebody’s bottom line, eh?
Would your dog buy something like this? Doubt it. And you are smarter than your dog, how? – CTZen
Brian, your concern would probably be put to much better use at right wing blogs where grammar and punctuation are considered tools of the fascist elite. Or maybe you should go hang with some teabaggers. Their protest signs leave much to be desired in those areas, although I do deeply appreciate the unintentional hilarity of irony being bludgeoned to death.
[G]rammar and punctuation are considered tools of the fascist elite at right wing blogs?!? Frankly, I’m skeptical.
Why, of all things, would I want to hang out with people who dip their scrotums into the mouths of others? What would that possibly have to do with me? I don’t even see why you would suggest it.
But on a different note, I am a little surprised at your response. To tell you the truth Dr. Prole, I actually would have thought that your respect for sophistication (really, a minimum of sophistication, at that) would have been a little more, I don’t know: lively? active? functional? Guess I was wrong.
Perhaps there’s a connection to be found between your lack of agreement that (minimal) cognitive sophistication is a good thing and to be desired, and your animosity toward me (owing to taking the political positions that you do) — who knows?
Brian: OK, I get it, you’re a contrarian. Congratulations. But if you’re aiming at improved punctuation, you could work on removing the many parenthetical asides from your paragraphs. They’re mildly annoying, and hinder fluid reading.
Just sayin’. For the sake of making the world a better place, that is. 🙂
Brian, you talk like a sausage. And really, you make an awful lot of assumptions.
Let me put my comment in terms that might be a little easier for you to understand: nobody here needs scolding or correction from the likes of you. Your super-fantastic command of the English language and self-serving need to correct others would be put to better use at blogs where there are actually lots of people who might benefit from that. If you are truly concerned with making the world a better place through being an online spelling/grammar/punctuation cop, then you should go where there is need. No animosity, just a suggestion.
In other words, nobody likes a know-it-all.
brebis noire,
Thanks. I realize I do that too much. As I try to put my thoughts down textually, that just seems to more accurately reflect my position. I realize it is bad writing, and I try to do less, but I’ll try even harder.
Sure would be nice if there were a preview feature…